what I present here is my personal opinion that I have collected over the Internet (website and forums), so it may be false, the officer I'm not a bad purchase decision has been due to my opinion:)
Basically, here is a ranking of the quality of TV:
- plasma high-end (too expensive, such as Pioneer)
- LCD high-end (such as the BRAVIA sony or samsung is the best out there, very expensive but not too expensive)
- quality LCD (the best value for money of all TVs in the market and falling prices Perman, like most Samsung, Panasonic, Toshiba, Philips, it depends on model)
- Plasma TV quality (you should see this test is very expensive but not very expensive)
- low-end LCD (no brand names or little known): very cheap and is the only option if you do not have enough money to buy the previous choice, excellent value for money, price declines continue and improve the quality and TV approaches The best kept as well.
- Plasma bottom line: To be avoided, the worst TV on the market, you can throw money into the water by buying a TV is, it could fail at any time and especially we can have burn-in problem (in part or whole screen burns, stains on the screen is not repaired, and a lifetime screen is very short ...
LCD Advantages:
You can easily watch TV in a bright room (open windows and sun)
For HD video source (blu ray hd dvd, ps3, xbox360, HD TV channels ...), image quality is very good and very accurate.
LCD Disadvantages:
The biggest problem for the LCD: low contrast problems (in black and very dark scenes you can not see much, like in a horror movie or video game Gears of War notammant some on the Xbox360 ... so we are forced to dark scenes to increase the brightness of the TV, which gives the results are not very realistic, and reduce image quality)
The problem of persistence (the image remains on the screen even after a new image, which gives a halo effect that is not fun) and lower fluidity of the image.
Video quality SD sources (non-HD TV channels such as TNT) is poor, especially in low-end LCDs that have bad upscaling chipset (chipset is responsible for improving the resolution of SD video to HD resolutions).
The builders have not produced a very very large size (60 inch +) so if you want 60 + inch we can move to the plasma. but this season and next year's LCD will not stop increasing in size in plsamas compete and play in the same areas hitherto reserved for terrirtoire home theater plasma TV 60 inches +
Edge Plasma:
- The biggest advantage: extremely high contrast, black light scene without suitable CRT (Sony Trinitron TV for example)
- Second biggest advantage: Primary Sources of good quality, much better than LCD, which does not fit the CRT remains the reference in the field.
- Lack of persistence and the fluidity of more than LCDs (but with new LCDs with response rates of less than 6 milliseconds and the situation began to turn into profits for a very high-end LCD)
- There is a very, very large size (60 inch +)
The weakness of Plasma:
- The biggest inconvenience: the effect quald mirror bright room, it is advisable to look at plasma Don with a little light in the room ... so if you want to place it on a TV show that very bright permanent: it alone will choose LCD.
- Slab problems in the lives of long-term low compared to the LCD (it's not like a CRT that can make tens of years, with a limited number of plasma Ona hours of use) and risk burning slab or the risk that some of the screen turn into a permanent stain ugly and annoying ... in short, plasma TV is a relatively risky investment compared with LCD, especially poor plasma under a egamme avoid at all costs.
Conclusion: Normally it is for you to do so after all this information! It depends on what you want!
I say in conclusion: If (this is rare) to have enough money and we want a very large TV (60 inches + for example) high-end plasma is the best choice!
but if it is not enough money (this is the case for most consumers), or if you want a TV under 42 inches: LCD is the best choice!
and whether it will see that the primary source (normal DVD, TNT ...) CRT is still the best option so far!
but I noticed that LCDs are being developed much faster than plasma and LCD is a weakness to be lost in time with new technology and innovation, and that within 2 years max, maybe Question: plasma or LCD? will not ask! LCD already won the battle if they continue to grow at this level:)
if I say stupid things but really me please!
Releated Post:
Post a Comment